Monday, July 30, 2007

Digital age ushers in epic cinema changes - The latest screens allow you to play video games, watch football or learn eye surgery.

July 30, 2006

By Matthew Goodman

THIS Saturday some young film fans won’t be going to the cinema simply to watch Cars, Disney’s new animated film about motor racing; they’ll be able to race them, too.

At Shepherds Bush in west London and six other Vue cinemas around Britain, youngsters will be able to play the computer game based on the new movie on the big screen.

Two players will be able to race each other at the same time, and there will be prizes for the fastest lap at the end of the day. Afterwards, they can, of course, buy a ticket to watch the movie itself.

“I don’t care how good your home-entertainment system is,” said Steve Knibbs, chief operating officer of Vue Entertainment. “Compare that with playing on a 40-foot screen with people watching you.”

The ability to lay on an event such as this is the result of the installation of digital projectors in cinemas.

Traditional analogue equipment is able only to project reels of film on to the big screen. But digital projectors open up a range of new possibilities. For instance, they allow exhibitors to provide video games or broadcast live events, such as football matches or pop concerts. They could even be used by companies for sales demonstrations or lectures.

They also allow cinemas to become more flexible with the films they show. A piece of celluloid for an analogue projector is heavy, unwieldy and expensive to produce. Digital films are much easier, like changing a cartridge on a video-games console, and a fraction of the cost to produce. For a chain such as Cineworld, which prides itself on screening films tailored to its local customer base, such as showing Bollywood movies in areas with large Indian populations, it will make life much easier.

While the technology for digital cinema has been around for years, it is only now starting to take a foothold in the UK. Of approximately 3,500 cinema screens in Britain, about 260 have been converted to digital. Worldwide, there are 849 digital screens. By 2010, it is forecast there will be 17,000.

Although the main benefit in switching to digital will be for the Hollywood studios, the prospect of generating extra revenue from showing concerts or sports events is appealing to the big chains, such as Cineworld, Odeon and Vue.

Cinemas have been slow to test such “alternative content” extensively. David Hancock, a senior analyst at Screen Digest, a consultancy, said: “One reason is that there has not been much high-definition programming produced and to get the benefit, content needs to be available in high definition. That’s why the World Cup worked this summer.”

Companies that have experimented with alternative content have been pleased with the results to date.

Gerald Buckle, Odeon’s vice- president of business affairs, reports that screenings of World Cup football matches at some of its cinemas doubled the average customer numbers it would expect from normal film usage over the year.

“Our average occupancy for film screenings is 10% to 15% across the year. The World Cup screenings had occupancy levels of about 30%,” he said.

A performance like this would seem to make the decision of whether or not to invest in digital screens a no-brainer.

But there are drawbacks. Buckle points out that big-ticket events, such as the World Cup or rock concerts do not come along very often, so the benefits are minimal, particularly given the amount of effort that has to go into marketing such screenings.

Proponents of digital cinema argue that it just needs a little more thought and imagination.

Howard Kiedaisch, of Arts Alliance Media, which has a contract with the UK Film Council to install and run the first 238 digital screens in Britain, said: “Cinema chains have to come up with a continuous programme of content.

“That doesn’t mean putting on something every day, but enough so they know the cinema becomes a destination for them. If, for example, you show football matches on a regular basis, you build awareness for when the World Cup comes round again.”

Some applications already used by digital cinemas are surprising. In Belgium, for example, doctors were able to watch an eye-surgery demonstration.

This opens up exciting possibilities, but it is likely to be a relatively small part of exhibitors’ business.

Knibbs at Vue Entertainment said: “Will alternative content overtake film in 10 years? No. Will it be a decent proportion of our business? Yes.”

The real beneficiaries will be the studios, which will have lower distribution costs. Once the Film Council-funded projectors are installed, the debate will switch to who will have to pay for the rest of the equipment.

Just the ticket

CINEMAS may be hoping to benefit from new income streams, but West End theatres are already booming.

Despite the terrorist attacks in London, 2005 was a record year for the capital’s big theatres, with box-office takings up to £375m — and 2006 could be even better, according to Richard Pulford, chief executive of the Society of London Theatre.

Ambassador Theatre Group, the West End’s largest operator, is likely to move into profit this year, while newcomer Nimax Theatres, which bought four theatres from Andrew Lloyd Webber last year, is also on course to be in the black after its first year of operation.

Theatre bosses have had a string of big hits and, with further blockbusters, such as Porgy & Bess, Dirty Dancing and Spamalot, coming out this autumn, they are feeling optimistic about the rest of the year.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article1084105.ece

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Saving the cineplex

Saving the cineplex

Can an entrepreneur persuade movie houses to go digital before it is too late?

FORTUNE Small Business Magazine

By Maggie Overfelt

July 19 2007: 4:35 PM EDT


Morristown, N.J. (FSB Magazine) -- Upstairs in one of the dark, dusty projection rooms at Brooklyn's Pavilion Digital Cinema, owner Bud Mayo watches an employee struggle to lift a 50-pound reel of 35-millimeter film out of its giant metal canister. After placing the film on a shelf the size of a tractor wheel, the projectionist will manually splice reels, inserting ads and trailers that will get fed into a bulky projector. The process can take as long as four hours. Mayo shifts his weight. He's impatient, and with good reason. Near the projector sits a sleek network server system it looks like a stack of industrial hard drives - that can do this entire job almost instantly, with a few clicks of the mouse. That server is the heart of Mayo's new digital projection system, and Mayo says it will do more than just save time. It might just save the nation's movie theaters.

Mayo, 65, should be retired by now. But seven years ago the former IBM computer salesman, Wall Street banker, and independent-theater owner pulled himself away from the golf course after watching major movie chains such as United Artists descend into bankruptcy in the mid-1990s. The solution, Mayo felt, was obvious: digital distribution and projection, a nascent technology that Mayo predicted could reduce costs and boost revenues. And so he began his quest, founding Access Integrated Technologies (accessitx.com) in Morristown, N.J., with the goal of dragging movie houses into the Digital Age. "Someone had to be first," he says quietly.

Current Issue

In an era of declining box office sales and competition from home entertainment systems, movie theaters see digital projection as a way to increase revenues. For example, to fill empty seats during a slow movie run, theaters can use digital projection to show live concerts and sporting events, such as the Super Bowl or a performance from the Metropolitan Opera. It's also more effective for showing alternative movie formats. "In digital, 3-D movies are much crisper and don't cause eye fatigue," says Carl Wagner, vice president of film for Rave Motion Pictures in Dallas and an AccessIT customer.

Digital benefits studios also. A digital movie is a 300-gigabyte computer file that studios encrypt and send via satellite. Traditionally, processing and shipping one 35-millimeter film runs around $1,500. The same movie can be transported digitally for about one-fifth the cost, potentially saving studios $3 billion a year. Once the theater downloads the file onto a server, staffers use AccessIT's software to manage the movie on an iPod-like playlist, adding content such as previews by dragging and dropping files. When the system is in place, theater owners can show any digital files they choose, not just movies. They can also attract more customers by adjusting the price of tickets or the offerings onscreen to match consumer demand. "In 2005, Hollywood made about $9 billion, and that's with theaters running at 15% capacity," says Mayo.

Despite the advantages of digital projection, only about 2,000 of the nation's 37,000 theaters have converted. The greatest stumbling block has been price: Going digital used to cost between $75,000 and $100,000 a screen. That's a hefty sum for theater owners to bear, especially when the bulk of the financial benefit goes to the studios.

Before developing any technology, Mayo sat down with studios and proposed that they redirect most of the money they save on film printing and delivery to theaters to help subsidize the cost of new equipment. Today AccessIT holds an 11-year agreement with all seven major studios, which pay the firm about $1,000 for each digital movie. In turn, AccessIT finances the projector rollout for its customers, offering movie houses the entire AccessIT package - satellite dish, software, servers, and projectors - for about $10,000 a screen annually, plus a one-time fee to install the software. "Until AccessIT, there wasn't any program that made it cost-effective for theaters to abandon millions of dollars' worth of film equipment," says John Ellison, president of UltraStar Cinemas in San Diego.

So far, AccessIT is the only company that offers a complete digital system for theater owners. That presents an opportunity for Mayo, but one that won't last long. Technicolor (technicolor.com) is developing a competing product that it hopes to provide to some 5,000 screens by 2010. Concentrating on independent theaters and regional chains, AccessIT converted 1,538 screens last year and is moving at a pace of about 266 theaters a month. The firm has also won over content providers; Walt Disney Studios signed on in 2005 as the first studio to supply films compatible with AccessIT's technology. Twentieth Century Fox and Universal followed. And AccessIT recently won a contract to license its distribution software to IMAX.

But that may not be enough to protect Mayo from the impending competition. Michael Karagosian, digital cinema consultant for the National Association of Theater Owners, says that most owners may wait until the technology is proven before diving in. "AccessIT sells to the early adopter," he says.

AccessIT's competitors argue that the upstart is moving too quickly. Technicolor favors a slow rollout, so it can fix the glitches that come with digital technology. On the rare occasion that a digital projection fails, the screen goes dark, and it can take time to identify and fix the problem. "Film might get a bit out of focus, but it doesn't stop the show," says Joe Berchtold, president of Technicolor Theatrical Services. "But when you have a situation where the screen goes dark with digital, you're gambling with the livelihood of the studios and exhibitors. That doesn't make sense for us." AccessIT customers, Berchtold, and Mayo say that today in about 99 of 100 movie showings systems do not fail.

In any case, Mayo isn't slowing down. "Bud is at the forefront of this movement," says Paul Glantz, owner of Emagine Entertainment in Troy, Mich., and an AccessIT customer. "If another company came to me and said, 'Here's what I've got for you,' it would be hard to convince me that it's a better opportunity."

http://www.dcinematoday.com/dc/extURLs.aspx?ID=290

Thursday, July 12, 2007

ISDCF KDM Working Group Distribution.

To: ISDCF KDM Working Group Distribution.

From: Peter Walford

Date: 12 July 2007

Subject: KDM Considerations in French and German National Film Agency Digital Cinema Proposals

Government and industry have a tradition of closer cooperation in Europe than is common in the United States. In France and Germany, a special tax on cinema receipts is used to fund their national film agencies, which in turn provide some financial support and guidance for their cinema industries. These agencies currently have a strong focus on the transition to digital cinema. In addition to assisting the different industry segments, their goal is to ensure maintenance of the creative diversity of the European film offering and to ensure the viability and diversity of the many small theaters in their countries.

This note summarizes the KDM related aspects of current proposals from these agencies and of studies commissioned by them. Its purpose is to foster information exchange and assist ISDCF in considering European issues and business organization in their deliberations and recommendations. It is based on the following documents published on the film agencies' websites:

Germany:

"System Specification for Digital Cinema in Germany", Dr. Siegfried Fößel et al., Fraunhofer Institute, commissioned by German Federal Film Board,30 March 2007. [In German].

http://www.ffa.de/start/download.php?file=/digitaleskino/FFA_Systemspezifikationen_V1.01.pdf

France:

" Digital projection in cinema. Provisionnal document of the CNC (national centre of cinematography)", June 2007. [in English]

http://www.cnc.fr/CNC_GALLERY_CONTENT/DOCUMENTS/UK/publications/digital_projection.pdf

"FAREWELL TO FILM? What Is at Stake in Digital Projection?", Daniel Goudineau, August 2006, commission by CNC.

http://www.cnc.fr/CNC_GALLERY_CONTENT/DOCUMENTS/rapports/rapportGoudineau.pdf [In French].

http://www.cnc.fr/CNC_GALLERY_CONTENT/DOCUMENTS/rapports/Goudineau_Version_abregee_anglais.pdf [abridged version in English].

Some of the recommendations in these documents (such as the establishment of a national database of server public certificates) would be controversial in the US. These things will not necessarily happen - they are part of an ongoing dialogue, and their applicability may be limited to local or European productions. The arrangements made by Hollywood studios and other US entities may be quite different, and each company should definitely rely on the information provided by their local people in Europe.

However, it will be beneficial to the entire industry if ISDCF considers these European business and technical issues in preparing their recommendations. The ISDCF reports and recommendations should be applicable and and adoptable internationally as well as domestically in the US. This will lead to the fastest rollout of digital cinema by reducing uncoordinated and incompatible development and business practices in different countries. It will also reduce cost by avoiding burdening exhibitors and other parties with multiple solutions to the same problem. The work of ISDCF is very much appreciated in Europe, as indicated by the following quote from the June 2007 document of the French CNC:

" ..two crucial questions concerning the interoperability of equipment and film recording supports have only been very partially addressed by the SMPTE's work...

However, given the very tight schedule, the best solution is probably to take action by defining the good practices to be maintained between professionals in liaison with the American association ISDCF"

Proposals common to both French and German recommendations

A. National certificate database. This would contain the public certificates of all equipment installed in cinemas required to generate KDMs. Note that the French and German databases are independent of each other. Particular characteristics:

  1. Each database managed by trusted independent organization, either the national film agency itself or service provider contracted by national film agency.
  2. Certificates supplied by installer company or exhibitor.
  3. Real-time secure update mechanism required.
  4. Database accessible to all entities requiring access to certificates - exhibitors, distributors, installers, KDM service providers,...
  5. Indexed by theater.
  6. Redundant system with 24/7 operations support.
  7. Certificates can be cached by entities generating KDMs.
  8. Internet-accessible index of cinemas with Digital projection capability [French proposal only].

B. Government-managed certification of entities. Companies that produce and transport DCPs and companies that generate KDMs should be certified to ensure interoperability and trust:

  1. French proposal favors creation of national test platform open to industry with publication of results.
  2. German proposal. National film agency certifies post houses and DCP producers for color correction, DCDM construction, DCP generation. Agency can then match certified companies to the particular requirements of companies seeking providers.

C. KDMs should be provided to allow DCP playout in all auditoriums of the theater. Logs can be used by distributor to verify screenings correspond with distribution agreement.

Selected proposals from German recommendation.

A. KDM Service Providers. The Fraunhofer specification envisions that exhibition KDMs would be created and managed by a [limited] number of specialized companies known as KDM Service Providers: "Central, independent entities equally recognized by all parties should be entrusted with KDM generation. The gatekeeper function from one party is to be avoided." Particular characteristics:

  1. KDM Service Provider commissioned by distributor, who specifies KDM validity.periods.
  2. Content keys sent to KDM Service Provider in "studio" KDM encrypted with KDM Service Provider public-key. Specification includes some security requirements for systems that extract content keys from "studio" KDMs, such as system not accessible from open network, etc.
  3. KDM Service Provider generates KDMs for theaters, using "content authenticator" field to refer to certificate of production house that generated DCP.
  4. KDM Service Provider uses equipment certificates retrieved from national certificate database to generate KDMs.
  5. Logs are uploaded to KDM Service Provider which processes them and distribute results to distributor, content provider and/or other rights owners.

B. KDM distribution technologies:

  1. Internet.
  2. Push through analogue or ISDN connection.
  3. Good old USB sticks.

C. KDMs should be sent 48 hours before schedule screening and KDM window should open 24 hours before screening.

Selected proposals from French recommendation.

The 2006 Goudineau report commissioned by the CNC was a thorough analysis of requirements for the transition to digital cinema in the French cinema business environment. Daniel Goudineau, Director of France Televisions, was given extensive resources for the report and interviewed a large number of experts from all sectors of the French cinema industry as well as experts from elsewhere in Europe and the USA. The report very much helped focus the French industry on the coming transition. However, some of its recommendations are being revisited as the industry learns more and considers other alternatives. In comparison, the June 2007 interim report prepared by CNC staff is considerably more modest in scope.

The Goudineau report recommended that the CNC issue an RFP and select a single central service provider to generate all exhibitor KDMs for France. However, the June 2007 interim CNC report notes that there is no “minimum consensus” for this approach and that legislation would probably be required to make it possible. The interim report includes some specific requirements for companies that generate KDMs but does not go so far as the German specification in recommending that only specialized KDM Service Providers perform this function.

A. The interim report slightly favors a model where the exhibitor has more responsibility for ordering and financing required services and equipment, with government regulation ensuring the quality of the supplier companies.

B. Exhibitors should be responsible for providing log files to distributors. Exhibitors could delegate this to service providers.

Monday, July 2, 2007

AccessIT: The Big Digital Picture

http://seekingalpha.com/article/39779-accessit-the-big-digital-picture

posted on: July 02, 2007 about stocks: AIXD

It would seem as though digital entertainment pervades our lives these days, from DVDs to digital satellite and cable television. But one medium still relies on old-fashioned silver halide film: the movies shown in your local theater.

Access Integrated Technology Inc. (AIXD), launched in March of 2000, is trying to change that. AccessIT is the leader in installing digital equipment into theaters. Now it’s moving into distributing digital films to its equipment in the theaters. It acquired a private company, Big Picture, for about $4 million last quarter. Big Picture produces alternative digital entertainment, such as animated films and sports and concert events, enabling theaters to provide alternative programming to targeted audiences during slow times that normally attract very small audiences.

While most major research firms have so far ignored the space, several analysts covering the company believe the potential is huge. “I’m a believer in digital cinema,” says Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Callum Capital. “There is absolutely an audience out there for alternative content.”

But AccessIT’s future could be bigger than an iMax double feature. It has distribution contracts with News Corp.’s 20th Century Fox (NWS), Viacom, Inc.’s (VIA) Paramount Pictures and General Electric Company’s (GE) Universal Studios. The studios currently help fund the theaters’ transition to digital, paying a fee every time a digital film is shown. So far AccessIT distributes mostly small films, but its executives have made it clear that transmitting feature films is on the digital horizon, predicting film distribution will be its largest revenue producer in five to seven years.

AccessIT has installed systems for 2,600 theater screens and is on track to reach its promised 4,000 screens by the end of next year. Currently, most of the films are delivered on DVDs, but AccessIT is also installing satellite dishes on the theaters, allowing it to beam films directly to them. The company promises to reach at least another 4,000 screens by 2011, but Mark Harding with Maxim Group believes it could hit an additional 10,000 screens by then. Its few competitors have installed equipment for just a few hundred screens. “AccessIT has a solid head start on its competition,” says Harding.

One big potential competitor is National CineMedia Inc. (NCMI), a joint venture between three of the largest theater chains in the business, AMC Entertainment, Inc., Cinemark USA, Inc. and Regal Entertainment Group (RGC). National CineMedia distributes mostly low end digital equipment, and most of its content is advertising for the screen and lobby kiosks. But it also has bigger plans. It is upgrading its equipment to devices capable of showing feature films, and has so far upgraded its machines for about 100 of the 12,000 screens it serves. With National CineMedia’s major theater backing, AccessIT’s ability to infiltrate new theaters could start to look as limited as the distribution of a foreign-language film.

AccessIt has also had trouble turning a profit. In its fourth quarter ended in March, revenues were $17.3 million, more than triple its revenues the same quarter last year, but its net loss nearly quadrupled to $11.3 million, or $0.47 per share. Analysts had expected a net loss of $0.24 per share. After a big run in 2005 and 2006, when it reached about $15 per share, the stock hit $5.23, its current 52-week low, at the beginning of April 2007.

National CineMedia, by contrast, went public at $21 just last February. It reported revenues of $56 million for its March quarter, double those of a year ago, and a net loss of $3.2 million, about a third its loss from last year. Its stock reached a peak of $29.80 in early June and now trades at about $28. NCMI’s market cap is $1.17 billion, nearly 21 times quarterly revenues, while AccessIt’s is $185 million, about 11 times revenues.

Still, AccessIT’s Q4 loss was due primarily to non-cash expenses, such as depreciation from the equipment it owns and installs in theaters, amortization of intangible assets and disposition of assets. Much of that was due to discontinuing its Data Centers line of business, co-location sites to house computer and telecommunications equipment for corporations.

Without the write offs, AccessIT is profitable. EBITDA earnings for the quarter were $3.4 million (National CineMedia’s EBITDA earnings were $24 million). Investors noticed: since it released its earnings on June 20, AccessIt’s stock has increased from about $7 to $8. Profits should improve from increased distribution of alternative entertainment. Craig-Hallum’s Van Rhee estimates that if it averages just 15 showings on 4,000 screens per year, as the company expects, it can generate $60 million in cash annually, compared with $400,000 last quarter.

For those betting that distribution of films, rather than equipment, is the big picture for digital cinema, AcessIT could have the advantage. By pitting its major studio partners against NationalCinema’s major theater partners, AccessIt could eventually prove to be the real blockbuster.

Disclosure: Access Integrated Technology Inc. is in the portfolio of Rising Star Stocks, an independent investment advisory published by Business Financial Publishing, the owner of SmallCapInvestor.com